nice pics. that logo is pretty schweet.
This is what I mean about web models who have nothing real going for them but figure they may as well start a site because their boyfriend thought it was a good idea. She's not that pretty, her body is rather typical with few curves and she has no boobs. The photography is also beyond pedestrian, probably done by some guy who has been at it for years and never deviates from the same tired, depthless ligting setup we've all seen for years now (two umbrella lights on stands at a 45 degree angle to the subject is what it looks like to me) which he has used on billions of other chicks. He's convinced it looks just great, I'm sure. Someone please send that chick some Bactine, I think it would help to relieve the itching from those mosquito bites she probably thinks are tits.
To all future webcam chicks, again: please make sure you have something actually going on looks wise before you clog the medium with yourselves. Three tease pics followed by a titty shot is not enough to carry the act. If they had dick sites for girls, I would not have one featuring myself because I know my dick is just average. Why would anyone want to see it? I would not even bother. These models on the web need to adopt the same logic.
Damn.. shes cute. I have more , trying to find them
we don't need to hear about your penis, jeff. and for the record, i think josie is fucking sexy and i couldn't care less about what fuckin angle the umbrella lights are on for christs sake. the girl has sex appeal, thank god she shares it with all of us.