[PDA] the most beautiful girls I've ever seen 2

more soon

excellent pics!!! thanks for the share.

Az

Many models are in the 14 to 17 age range. However they do not often pose nude. Like your post Tomorrow..

Quote:

Originally posted by anygirl

The girls' bored expression in many of the pix is a turn-off, but they are pretty girls.

That's my problem with the majority of photos, especially pro photos. No matter how good the body is if the face says she's bored, disinterested, or worse, coerced, I'm not interested. There is nothing better than a photo of a woman wearing nothing but a smile and looking like she is enjoying every moment of being in front of the camera.

Just my $0.02.

Quote:

Originally posted by Topsail

Many models are in the 14 to 17 age range. However they do not often pose nude. Like your post Tomorrow..

That doesn't mean they can be posted here. The site rules are no under 18 pictures...clothed or nude.

Quote:

Originally posted by tomorrowneverknows

ι know that many girls look young, but since they are pro models, I think they are all are adults

It concerns me that both the OP and and an other member feels that some of the girls look or may be underage, but that because they're either pro or non nude its ok to post them here. As stated above, it doesn't matter if they are clothed or not...no under 18 pics are allowed. As for the picture being pro, that doesn't mean the girl is of age. The only way you can prove a pro pic is over 18 is if it can be traced back to a legit website that is 18 U.S.C. 2257 compliant.
Because its impossible to tell if all girls are over 18, and impossible to prove if they are 18 U.S.C. 2257 compliant, the rule on WBW has ALWAYS been; if she looks under 18, the pic is to be deleted.

Seriously...can a moderator do something about this thread. Do #191-1, #192-1, and #193-3 look like they're 18?

Quote:

Originally posted by Sugarpie

Seriously...can a moderator do something about this thread. Do #191-1, #192-1, and #193-3 look like they're 18?

Quote:

Originally posted by Sugarpie

Seriously...can a moderator do something about this thread. Do #191-1, #192-1, and #193-3 look like they're 18?

The pics are from MET,I am confident that they are just skinny, not underage

Quote:

Originally posted by Sugarpie

Seriously...can a moderator do something about this thread. Do #191-1, #192-1, and #193-3 look like they're 18?

I agree with Sugarpie. They may be 18+, but I don't like images like this either. Skinny girls made to look underage foster the same perverted notions as actual underage girls. There are so many beautiful, age-appropriate women in the world that we should not show young-looking girls who are on the margins of propriety.

I think that "looks under 18" should be sufficient grounds for deletion.