What I wouldn't do for her.

I never rate a girl higher than three if I can't see her face. A three is for a PERFECT body (such as this one).

If it's not repugnant in some way, I give it a two.

If there is anything on her body that I find at all undesirable, it gets a 1.

This is a site for rating girls, not just rating abs and hips.

A lot of people here feel this way. While she's got a gorgeous body, we're interested in the entire girl.

There are about 1.5 million pics on this site. If we can't see her face, A LOT of us will rate lower.

great body and those tits are awesome.

the only legit case to be made for a low(ish) rating is the lack of face - but still enough here for at least a 6 (if you figure 5 is average)

no way this girl rates an average score, not with tits like that

fantastic body.... nice and tight.. perky yummy tits

Quote:

Originally posted by sah

I'm looking at this photo with 33 ratings. 25% of the people have voted this vision a 1. Clearly the rating also acts as an IQ test. It's also interesting that while there are lots of 7,8, and 9s, no one ever seems to mess up on the low end. There is 25% 1s and no 2, 3, or 4s. I guess this means that the ones mostly likely to be stupid are also the ones most likely to consider her a 10 (or a 1 for dummies).

she has a tight little body. most pics dont get rated over the realm of 6 even thou 100 percent would screw there brains out given the chance. the ratings are stupid, just be glad there are hot chicks to look at. peace

I'm looking at this photo with 33 ratings. 25% of the people have voted this vision a 1. Clearly the rating also acts as an IQ test. It's also interesting that while there are lots of 7,8, and 9s, no one ever seems to mess up on the low end. There is 25% 1s and no 2, 3, or 4s. I guess this means that the ones mostly likely to be stupid are also the ones most likely to consider her a 10 (or a 1 for dummies).