Rating
Statistics
Published | 14 years ago |
---|---|
Uploaded by | HighGuy |
Dimensions | 565 753 |
Category | Tight Asses |
Series | |
Views | 7767 |
Comments | 33 |
Tags
Published | 14 years ago |
---|---|
Uploaded by | HighGuy |
Dimensions | 565 753 |
Category | Tight Asses |
Series | |
Views | 7767 |
Comments | 33 |
She gets a 10 from me just for the fuckin flag!
I'm not trying to pat myself on the back for defending her, I was simply trying to point out that your reasoning in judging her was a little flawed. Since you seem intent on defending that judgment without considering the validity of my argument I'll apologize for the annoyance and politely dismiss myself from the conversation.
But pedantry aside, some people judge pictures entirely upon specific physical attributes of the people therein, others - such as myself - vote on the totality of the picture. I took all the circumstantial evidence into account and made a judgement, as humans are wont to do. (If you'll note, my original comment had nothing to do with her intelligence; I only offered my reasoning for the low score I gave after being questioned about it. It's not as if I initially commented with the specific intent of questioning her racial tolerances - and thus her intelligence.) It is possible she's some erudite Rhodes Scholar writing her thesis on the plight of inner-city minorites? Sure, but if I'm assigning probabilities that possibility is at the tail of the bell curve.
It's also possible that someone in a KKK outfit standing by a burning cross is as tolerant as Ghandi and intelligent as Stephen Hawking, but the odds are against it, and you can be quite comfortable labeling that person a racist moron.
Sometimes a cigar is actually just a cigar.
Seeing as you're saying it's wrong to judge a person by the visible choices they make I'm sure you're being hypocritical, since basically all humans do it on a daily basis. It's just the way our lizard brains work.
But hey, if it makes you feel better to defend this woman's intelligence and honor, by all means, continue to do so and pat yourself on the back.
But your analogy is way off. It's more like judging a book by the totality of cover, the chapter titles, the intro on the jacket of the book and some book reviews of the title. People do this every day. There are lots of books I haven't read because I've looked at them and discarded them for one reason or another. Perhaps one of them was a masterpiece; perhaps not. That's just the way decisions are made.
The image paints a picture of the woman and the surroundings, and it's not one of an aristocrat or a student of political philosophy.
Also, do you see the irony of posting a critique of someone making a judgement based solely on a photograph in a gallery of pictures that exists so that people may vote on them?
Hey champ, who are you referring to, Spalsh or me?
How many libraries have you filled with books you've read just by looking at the covers?
Pointed it out? He sounds like a gayish apologetic cuckold.
I lol'd..
I was just responding to fredg222.
As for the coke - yeah, I missed that the first time through.
I just think racists are generally morons.
And I'm aware that the flag originally didn't symbolize racial differences, but instead Southern rebellion to Northern political domination, but that changed during the Civil Rights movement as that flag was used as a symbol of resistance to it.
And if I had to guess, a bottomless broad, wearing a jean-jacket, standing on a messy-ass table, with posing for a picture while wearing zebra-colored heels in front of a Confederate Flag with a bottle of Yeager on the table probably isn't displaying it for its representation of political resistance to Northern governmental oppression.
But hey, I could be wrong.
And, of course, you needn't point any of this out in the first place, since the post you took umbrage with ended with my saying, "Of course, I could be wrong." I'm well aware that I'm generalizing with incomplete information. The difference between you and I is that I'm comfortable with that.