Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyNomad

Dudes, this is what a ten looks like. This is what you rate a ten. Not some chick that has her butt stuck in the air and you can't see if she has tits or a horse face. Yes, it would be better if she were naked, but it would also be better if normal chicks or a picture of a body part stopped getting rated so highly on the WBW home page.

I agree with NaughtyNomad that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
Some others think the hole is greater than some other parts.
Others think there are parts greater than some of the holes.

Ratings have been a frequent forum topic forever. Different tastes are compounded by different scales. Voice your opinion and don't take it too seriously. If enough people participate, averaging works to manage the outliers.

Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyNomad

Dudes, this is what a ten looks like. This is what you rate a ten. Not some chick that has her butt stuck in the air and you can't see if she has tits or a horse face. Yes, it would be better if she were naked, but it would also be better if normal chicks or a picture of a body part stopped getting rated so highly on the WBW home page.

I rarely - if ever - rate higher than 8 when the woman's face is not in the picture. Face is most important. Many interesting and beautiful body types are "10-worthy" so long as the woman has a great face.

Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyNomad

Dudes, this is what a ten looks like. This is what you rate a ten. Not some chick that has her butt stuck in the air and you can't see if she has tits or a horse face. Yes, it would be better if she were naked, but it would also be better if normal chicks or a picture of a body part stopped getting rated so highly on the WBW home page.

and here i always thot we were rating PICTURES not soley what was IN the pictures...

Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyNomad

Dudes, this is what a ten looks like. This is what you rate a ten. Not some chick that has her butt stuck in the air and you can't see if she has tits or a horse face. Yes, it would be better if she were naked, but it would also be better if normal chicks or a picture of a body part stopped getting rated so highly on the WBW home page.

She's a 7 at best

Quote:

Originally posted by NaughtyNomad

Dudes, this is what a ten looks like. This is what you rate a ten. Not some chick that has her butt stuck in the air and you can't see if she has tits or a horse face. Yes, it would be better if she were naked, but it would also be better if normal chicks or a picture of a body part stopped getting rated so highly on the WBW home page.

But what if the ass stuck in the air is a perfect ass?

Dudes, this is what a ten looks like. This is what you rate a ten. Not some chick that has her butt stuck in the air and you can't see if she has tits or a horse face. Yes, it would be better if she were naked, but it would also be better if normal chicks or a picture of a body part stopped getting rated so highly on the WBW home page.